The beginning of the universe. There are but few ways to interpret the physics behind what most scientists believe about the beginning. If we choose to subscribe to the idea that space and time are one in the same, a single fabric along a higher dimensional surface, then the question of whether there was ever a beginning is much easier to explain. It relates to every paradox, such as the line "this sentence is false", or the idea of infinitely much space between two particles. While easy to explain it remains difficult (technically impossible) to understand having a finite mind. However, like viewing the shadow of a fourth dimensional object as a sphere phasing in and out of space, we can construct an idea which represents the whole and contains its entire compression.
The beginning was never quite a beginning. Like the answer to the question of the state of light on a molecular scale, or the existence of Shrodinger's cat, the answer is simultaneously both: yes and no. The universe is a self-contained entity of both existence and non-existence. This state is obviously unstable, but what acts as a stabilizer is the very substance along which reality is bound, space time. The theory postulates that for every particle of matter there is antimatter. This gives the layman an opportunity to describe the existence of everything as a state duality between mutually unresolved states of being, like when completing the square in a binomial and adding a clever form of 0. We've simultaneously created and destroyed, hence taking no action while simultaneously taking every action.
So if you're still reading, you may be wondering why you exist this way. The answer is that you don't. You have the illusion of existence through time, a solid multidimensional construct (think of it as a marble) along which you exist only as part of its design.
Comments